[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMM=eLcGTYcSdYW9vWYWk64dRuwgyY_O90NySb_jR9zQTCBTJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 21:04:25 -0500
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache/md: Use raid stripe size
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com> wrote:
> Now that we've got code for raid5/6 stripe awareness, bcache just needs
> to know about the stripes and when writing partial stripes is expensive
> - we probably don't want to enable this optimization for raid1 or 10,
> even though they have stripes. So add a flag to queue_limits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
> ---
> This is in my pile of bcache stuff queued up for 3.14 - if no one objects it'll
> be in my bcache pull request:
>
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 1 +
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
Hi Kent,
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 02cb6f0ea7..0375654adb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -291,6 +291,7 @@ struct queue_limits {
> unsigned char discard_misaligned;
> unsigned char cluster;
> unsigned char discard_zeroes_data;
> + unsigned char raid_partial_stripes_expensive;
> };
>
> struct request_queue {
If you add a new member to queue_limits you need to update
blk_stack_limits() so that it propagates as you stack devices.
You probably also want to update blk_set_default_limits.
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists