[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140106223746.567305828@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:36:44 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Aaron Liu <liucy214@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 043/144] arm64: ptrace: avoid using HW_BREAKPOINT_EMPTY for disabled events
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
commit cdc27c27843248ae7eb0df5fc261dd004eaa5670 upstream.
Commit 8f34a1da35ae ("arm64: ptrace: use HW_BREAKPOINT_EMPTY type for
disabled breakpoints") fixed an issue with GDB trying to zero breakpoint
control registers. The problem there is that the arch hw_breakpoint code
will attempt to create a (disabled), execute breakpoint of length 0.
This will fail validation and report unexpected failure to GDB. To avoid
this, we treated disabled breakpoints as HW_BREAKPOINT_EMPTY, but that
seems to have broken with recent kernels, causing watchpoints to be
treated as TYPE_INST in the core code and returning ENOSPC for any
further breakpoints.
This patch fixes the problem by prioritising the `enable' field of the
breakpoint: if it is cleared, we simply update the perf_event_attr to
indicate that the thing is disabled and don't bother changing either the
type or the length. This reinforces the behaviour that the breakpoint
control register is essentially read-only apart from the enable bit
when disabling a breakpoint.
Reported-by: Aaron Liu <liucy214@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -214,31 +214,29 @@ static int ptrace_hbp_fill_attr_ctrl(uns
{
int err, len, type, disabled = !ctrl.enabled;
- if (disabled) {
- len = 0;
- type = HW_BREAKPOINT_EMPTY;
- } else {
- err = arch_bp_generic_fields(ctrl, &len, &type);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ attr->disabled = disabled;
+ if (disabled)
+ return 0;
- switch (note_type) {
- case NT_ARM_HW_BREAK:
- if ((type & HW_BREAKPOINT_X) != type)
- return -EINVAL;
- break;
- case NT_ARM_HW_WATCH:
- if ((type & HW_BREAKPOINT_RW) != type)
- return -EINVAL;
- break;
- default:
+ err = arch_bp_generic_fields(ctrl, &len, &type);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ switch (note_type) {
+ case NT_ARM_HW_BREAK:
+ if ((type & HW_BREAKPOINT_X) != type)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ case NT_ARM_HW_WATCH:
+ if ((type & HW_BREAKPOINT_RW) != type)
return -EINVAL;
- }
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
}
attr->bp_len = len;
attr->bp_type = type;
- attr->disabled = disabled;
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists