[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140107095039.GA2480@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:50:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
Morten.Rasmussen@....com, cmetcalf@...era.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
alex.shi@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, rjw@...k.pl,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@....net, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, james.hogan@...tec.com,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
Dietmar.Eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: CPU topology try
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 03:10:21PM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> What if we want to add arch specific flags to the NUMA domain? Currently
> with Peter's patch:https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/5/239 and this patch,
> the arch can modify the sd flags of the topology levels till just before
> the NUMA domain. In sd_init_numa(), the flags for the NUMA domain get
> initialized. We need to perhaps call into arch here to probe for
> additional flags?
What are you thinking of? I was hoping all NUMA details were captured in
the distance table.
Its far easier to talk of specifics in this case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists