[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CBD247.8080508@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:09:11 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Subject: Re: #pragma once?
On 2014-01-07 10:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Furthermore some userspace may rely on doing #define XXX to avoid
> including a specific kernel header (yes, it's ugly).
This pattern is also sometimes used:
$ head -6 include/linux/spinlock_up.h
#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_UP_H
#define __LINUX_SPINLOCK_UP_H
#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H
# error "please don't include this file directly"
#endif
And there is nothing ugly about it. So #pragma once is probably a good
idea for most headers that are not exposed to userspace. But making it a
requirement in scripts/checkpatch.pl or Documentation/CodingStyle means
that it will become hard to defend the few legitimate uses of ifndef
guards against people who have a printed copy of checkpatch.pl under
their pillow.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists