[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CBE321.4050906@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:21:05 +0800
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
To: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>, dchinner@...morbit.com,
bpm@....com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair with
INIT_WORK_ONSTACK()
Hi Chuansheng,
On 01/07 2014 16:53 PM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
>
> In case CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK is defined, it is needed to
> call destroy_work_on_stack() which frees the debug object to pair
> with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK().
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index 1394106..82e0dab 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
> INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args->work, xfs_bmapi_allocate_worker);
> queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args->work);
> wait_for_completion(&done);
> + destroy_work_on_stack(&args->work);
> return args->result;
> }
Thanks for your patch and it work fine for my testing. I missed this in an
old commit: [ 3b876c8f2a xfs: fix debug_object WARN at xfs_alloc_vextent() ]
Just out of curious, do you notice memory leaks or other hints which help you
finding out this problem?
Thanks,
-Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists