[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140107125404.GD26588@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:54:04 +0200
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"Prashant Gaikwad" <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: tegra: export apb dma readl/writel
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:07:26PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 12/24/2013 06:32 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > Export APB DMA readl and writel. These are needed because we can't access
> > the fuses directly on Tegra20 without potentially causing a system hang.
>
> This does a lot more than just export the functions; it also changes the
> prototypes. I'm not sure why the prototype change was required/useful.
> This needs to be mentioned in the commit description/subject, and the
> reasoning explained too.
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tegra-soc.h b/include/linux/tegra-soc.h
>
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_TEGRA20_APB_DMA)
> > +void tegra_apb_io_init(void);
>
> This seems to be an internal function; why is this one publicly
> prototyped and/or stubbed?
>
Ah. this might be a leftover from a previous iteration... Need to check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists