linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] net/mlx4_core: clean up two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389099622.15032.18.camel@x41>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:00:22 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>,
	Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] net/mlx4_core: clean up two functions

0) These two patches are very similar. They both clean up a function to
help GCC understand the codeflow. Both help silence a warning.

1) Compile tested only (on 32 bits x86). I do not have this hardware.

2) Please note that there's no MAINTAINERS entry for mlx4_core. (Neither
is there an entry for the MLX4 IB driver.) Shouldn't it be added? 

Paul Bolle (2):
  net/mlx4_core: clean up cq_res_start_move_to()
  net/mlx4_core: clean up srq_res_start_move_to()

 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c  | 96 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/