linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] tools lib traceevent: Add state member to struct trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140107130558.GB2919@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 14:05:58 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] tools lib traceevent: Add state member to struct
 trace_seq

On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:00:09PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

SNIP

>  void trace_seq_init(struct trace_seq *s);
> diff --git a/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c b/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
> index d7f2e68bc5b9..1747aa50ecb0 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/trace-seq.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,9 @@
>  #define TRACE_SEQ_POISON	((void *)0xdeadbeef)
>  #define TRACE_SEQ_CHECK(s)						\
>  do {									\
> -	if ((s)->buffer == TRACE_SEQ_POISON)			\
> -		die("Usage of trace_seq after it was destroyed");	\
> +	if (WARN_ONCE((s)->buffer == TRACE_SEQ_POISON,			\
> +		      "Usage of trace_seq after it was destroyed"))	\
> +		(s)->state = TRACE_SEQ__BUFFER_POISONED;		\
>  } while (0)
>  
>  /**
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ void trace_seq_init(struct trace_seq *s)
>  	s->readpos = 0;
>  	s->buffer_size = TRACE_SEQ_BUF_SIZE;
>  	s->buffer = malloc_or_die(s->buffer_size);
> +	s->state = TRACE_SEQ__GOOD;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -81,7 +83,7 @@ static void expand_buffer(struct trace_seq *s)
>  	s->buffer_size += TRACE_SEQ_BUF_SIZE;
>  	s->buffer = realloc(s->buffer, s->buffer_size);
>  	if (!s->buffer)
> -		die("Can't allocate trace_seq buffer memory");
> +		s->state = TRACE_SEQ__MEM_ALLOC_FAILED;

and also here?

	if (WARN_ONCE(!s->buffer))
		s->state = TRACE_SEQ__MEM_ALLOC_FAILED;

otherwise the whole series seems ok,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/