linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: remove scheduler domain naming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52CC1044.9040608@arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:33:40 +0000
From:	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: remove scheduler domain naming

On 07/01/14 10:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:41:25PM +0000, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> But the MC level cpu mask func ptr is called cpu_coregroup_mask.
> 
> Nothing a bit of sed won't cure very quickly indeed :-)

True, but that would mean that if two adjacent levels use the same
cpu_foo_mask function, then their debug name would have to be the same.
AFAICS, sd_parent_degenerate() allows adjacent levels to have the same
cpu mask if the flags are different. Probably not a big deal.

> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/