[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140107160738.4a76a6d0@endymion.delvare>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:07:38 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon/sensors: fix SENSORS_LM75 dependencies
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:57:52 -0400, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On 07-01-2014 10:05, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> > BTW, I've been thinking of make CONFIG_THERMAL a bool since long time ago, the only thing that blocks me is that Thermal subsystem needs to register a hwmon device for each thermal zone and CONFIG_HWMON is a tristate.
>
> I agree with the move of having CONFIG_THERMAL as bool. Unless you have
> use cases where users are dynamically loading and unloading thermal per
> user demand, which I doubt.
Modularity is not only about reloading modules (although this can be
useful for developers in particular.) It's also about enabling many
features in a generic distribution kernel and each feature only gets
loaded/used on the hardware which needs it. This is why, as a
distribution kernel maintainer, I keep complaining when I see boolean
options which might easily be tristates.
--
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists