[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1389111587-5923-1-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:19:36 +0000
From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, markgross@...gnar.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [0/11][REPOST] Energy-aware scheduling use-cases and scheduler issues
Reposting the series with LKML on cc as well.
Original thread (with a few replies) can be found here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/41501
Sorry for double-posting.
Morten
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
One of the requests from the scheduler maintainers at the Energy-aware
Scheduling workshop at Kernel Summit this year was to provide plain text
descriptions of use-cases (workloads) and system topologies. To get that
moving I have written some short texts about some use-cases. In addition
I described a list of issues that today prevent mainly the scheduler
from achieving a good energy/performance balance in common use-cases.
The follow-up emails are structured as follows:
1-6: Current issues related to energy/performance balance.
7-10: Use-cases (overall behaviour and energy/performance goals)
11: DVFS example (for reference)
I'm hoping that this provides some of the background for why I'm
interested in improving energy-awareness in the scheduler. I'm aware
that the use-cases and issues/wishlist don't cover everyone's area of
interest. Input is needed to fix that.
Comments and input are appreciated.
Morten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists