[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV13i8VicysHjKMmQtf+ZXCcCV+KiBVEnBONuf4=1w9_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:28:54 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf: add %pT[C012] format specifier
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>> The additional cost of using current vs NULL is ~zero.
>
> The additional cost of current vs NULL is cca 8 bytes per caller. Test
> for NULL is cca 4 bytes, maybe 20 bytes total. I believe it is worth
> it.
It depends (typical answer ;-)
On architectures that keep current in a register, the cost of using it is
usually zero, as there's typically no difference between pushing a register
or a zero on the stack, or moving a register or a zero to another register.
current_thread_info()->task is more expensive.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists