linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] net: Do not enable tx-nocache-copy by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140107.162053.1127386147694253061.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jan 2014 16:20:53 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bpoirier@...e.de
Cc:	edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, therbert@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: Do not enable tx-nocache-copy by default

From: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>
Date: Tue,  7 Jan 2014 10:11:10 -0500

> There are many cases where this feature does not improve performance or even
> reduces it.
> 
> For example, here are the results from tests that I've run using 3.12.6 on one
> Intel Xeon W3565 and one i7 920 connected by ixgbe adapters. The results are
> from the Xeon, but they're similar on the i7. All numbers report the
> mean±stddev over 10 runs of 10s.
> 
> 1) latency tests similar to what is described in "c6e1a0d net: Allow no-cache
> copy from user on transmit"
> There is no statistically significant difference between tx-nocache-copy
> on/off.
> nic irqs spread out (one queue per cpu)
 ...
> CC: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...e.de>

Looks good, applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/