linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: omap-usb-tll: Don't hold lock during pm_runtime_get/put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52CCF027.6040607@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:58:55 +0530
From:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:	<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <balbi@...com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: omap-usb-tll: Don't hold lock during pm_runtime_get/put_sync()

Hi,

On 12/18/2013 04:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> pm_runtime_get/put_sync() can sleep so don't hold spinlock while
>> calling them.
>>
>> This patch prevents a BUG() when CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is enabled.
>> Bug is present in Kernel versions v3.9 onwards.
>>
>> Reported-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
>> Tested-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.9+
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
>> index 0d946ae1..248004c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-tll.c
>> @@ -346,7 +346,9 @@ int omap_tll_init(struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
>>  	for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++)
>>  		needs_tll |= omap_usb_mode_needs_tll(pdata->port_mode[i]);
>>  
>> +	spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>>  	pm_runtime_get_sync(tll_dev);
>> +	spin_lock(&tll_lock);
> 
> This is pretty ugly. Can't you move it above the spin_lock() instead?

OK. I'll also remove NULL check for tll_dev outside the spin_lock().

> 
> <snip>
> 
>>  	tll = dev_get_drvdata(tll_dev);
>>  
>> +	spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>>  	pm_runtime_get_sync(tll_dev);
>> +	spin_lock(&tll_lock);
> 
> Same here?

Yes.

> 
>>  	for (i = 0; i < tll->nch; i++) {
>>  		if (omap_usb_mode_needs_tll(pdata->port_mode[i])) {
>> @@ -438,7 +441,6 @@ int omap_tll_enable(struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>> -
> 
> This doesn't belong in this patch and is now inconsistent with the
> other functions in the driver.

OK.

> 
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap_tll_enable);
>> @@ -464,9 +466,8 @@ int omap_tll_disable(struct usbhs_omap_platform_data *pdata)
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	pm_runtime_put_sync(tll_dev);
>> -
>>  	spin_unlock(&tll_lock);
>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(tll_dev);
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
> 

cheers,
-roger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/