[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140108074224.GA20157@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 08:42:25 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] vfio: Use new interfaces for MSI/MSI-X enablement
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:34:13AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 19:05 +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > This update also fixes a bug when deprecated pci_enable_msix()
> > and pci_enable_msi_block() functions return a positive return
> > value which indicats the number of interrupts that could have
> > been allocated rather than a successful allocation. The driver
> > misinterpreted this value and assumed MSI-X/MSIs are enabled,
> > although in fact it were not.
>
> No, the driver interpreted it correctly, which is why anything other
> than zero is handled as an error. This patch looks incorrect if the new
> interfaces follow the same return convention. Thanks,
The new interfaces differ wrt the return value - it is eigher a negative
error code or a positive number of successfuly allocated vectors.
If the user level makes use of a number of vectors that could have been
allocated then it should cease doing it, since only 0 or a negative error
code is returned after this update.
The changelog is incorrect as the driver indeed bailes out on positive
return values. I will send a updated version.
> Alex
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists