linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: atmel: add support for changing message transfer speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACQ1gAhsKeQUB_vN9iJDbBsJ+7CiOZH8O=ZPg96pP8qRDHf15g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:15:13 +0100
From:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Wenyou Yang <Wenyou.Yang@...el.com>,
	"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: atmel: add support for changing message transfer speed

2013/11/8 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:34:06AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> The only speed available was max_speed (the maximum speed declared for a
>> device).
>> This patch adds the support for spi_tranfer->speed_hz parameter.
>> We can now set a different speed for each spi message.
>
> Applied, thanks.

It seems that this patch got lost (or I missed something).
As it will now conflict with Wenyou patch "Refactor spi-atmel to use
SPI framework queue",
should I resent it based on wenyou's path ?
or on broonie/spi.git for-next and wenyou will rebase his patch on mine ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/