[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2193321.5PpjVl4PAc@sandpuppy>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 11:20:40 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
seiji.aguchi@....com, rientjes@...gle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] APIC: Read Error Status Register correctly
Am Montag, 23. Dezember 2013, 19:27:30 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Currently we do a read, a dummy write and a final read to fetch the error
> code. The value from the final read is taken.
> This is not the recommended way and leads to corrupted/lost ESR values.
>
> Intel(c) 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual,
>
> Combined Volumes 1, 2ABC, 3ABC, Section 10.5.3 states:
> >>Before attempt to read from the ESR, software should first write to it.
>
> (The value written does not affect the values read subsequently;
> only zero may be written in x2APIC mode.) This write clears
> any previously logged errors and updates the ESR with any errors
> detected since the last write to the ESR.
> This write also rearms the APIC error interrupt triggering mechanism.<<
>
> This patch removes the first read such that we are conform with the manual.
>
> On my (very old) Pentium MMX SMP system this patch fixes the issue that
> APIC errors a) are not always reported and b) are reported with false
> error numbers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 17 ++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> index d278736..4ec1dd6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -1968,7 +1968,7 @@ __visible void smp_trace_spurious_interrupt(struct
> pt_regs *regs) */
> static inline void __smp_error_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - u32 v0, v1;
> + u32 v;
> u32 i = 0;
> static const char * const error_interrupt_reason[] = {
> "Send CS error", /* APIC Error Bit 0 */
> @@ -1982,21 +1982,20 @@ static inline void __smp_error_interrupt(struct
> pt_regs *regs) };
>
> /* First tickle the hardware, only then report what went on. -- REW */
> - v0 = apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - v1 = apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> + v = apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> ack_APIC_irq();
> atomic_inc(&irq_err_count);
>
> - apic_printk(APIC_DEBUG, KERN_DEBUG "APIC error on CPU%d: %02x(%02x)",
> - smp_processor_id(), v0 , v1);
> + apic_printk(APIC_DEBUG, KERN_DEBUG "APIC error on CPU%d: %02x",
> + smp_processor_id(), v);
>
> - v1 = v1 & 0xff;
> - while (v1) {
> - if (v1 & 0x1)
> + v &= 0xff;
> + while (v) {
> + if (v & 0x1)
> apic_printk(APIC_DEBUG, KERN_CONT " : %s",
error_interrupt_reason[i]);
> i++;
> - v1 >>= 1;
> + v >>= 1;
> }
>
> apic_printk(APIC_DEBUG, KERN_CONT "\n");
Any comments on this?
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists