linux-kernel - Re: could you clarify mm/mempolicy: fix !vma in new_vma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA_GA1emcHt+9zOqAKHPoXLd-ofyfYyuQn9fcdLOox5k7BLgww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 20:09:30 +0800
From:	Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: could you clarify mm/mempolicy: fix !vma in new_vma_page()

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:

>
> If I was debugging this I would simply add printk into page_address_in_vma
> error paths.
>
> Anyway, I think that at least hugetlbfs part should be reverted because
> it might paper over real bugs. Although the migration would fail for
> such hugetlb page we should catch that a weird page was tried to be
> migrated. What about the patch below?

Looks good to me. But we need to confirm whether our assumption is right.
Sasha, could you please have a test with Michal's patch?

Thanks,
-Bob

> ---
> From 2d61421f26a3b63b4670d71b7adc67e2191b6157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:57:41 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: new_vma_page cannot see NULL vma for hugetlb pages
>
> 11c731e81bb0 (mm/mempolicy: fix !vma in new_vma_page()) has removed
> BUG_ON(!vma) from new_vma_page which is partially correct because
> page_address_in_vma will return EFAULT for non-linear mappings and at
> least shared shmem might be mapped this way.
>
> The patch also tried to prevent NULL ptr for hugetlb pages which is not
> correct AFAICS because hugetlb pages cannot be mapped as VM_NONLINEAR
> and other conditions in page_address_in_vma seem to be legit and catch
> real bugs.
>
> This patch restores BUG_ON for PageHuge to catch potential issues when
> the to-be-migrated page is not setup properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> ---
>  mm/mempolicy.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 9e8d2d86978a..f3f51464a23b 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1199,10 +1199,8 @@ static struct page *new_vma_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private, int *
>         }
>
>         if (PageHuge(page)) {
> -               if (vma)
> -                       return alloc_huge_page_noerr(vma, address, 1);
> -               else
> -                       return NULL;
> +               BUG_ON(vma)
> +               return alloc_huge_page_noerr(vma, address, 1);
>         }
>         /*
>          * if !vma, alloc_page_vma() will use task or system default policy
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/