lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140108144109.GA13649@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 09:41:09 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: kexec: reuse 1st kernel as kexec/kdump kernel?

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:24:22AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 01/07/14 at 09:37am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:34:06AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > > Hi, all
> > > 
> > > I have a question in mind: can we copy and prepare kexec kernel while
> > > normal booting?
> > > 
> > > Just like below wild idea:
> > > 
> > > Kernel uncompress itself (assume kernel is relocatable)
> > > -> copy the kernel image somewhere for backup
> > >   -> reserver crashkernel memory
> > >     -> copy the backuped kernel image/initrd image to reserved memory
> > >       -> copy the purgatory which can be embedded in elf section?
> > >         -> prepare the e820 memory ranges which is for kdump kernel
> > > 
> > > So userspace only need to call kexec reboot, kexec_load is not necessary.
> > > The initrd for kdump should be different, but we can add some different logic
> > > which will be only for kdump and it can be skipped in normal boot.
> > > 
> > > Is it doable?
> > 
> > What's the advantage of doing all this? Why are you trying to skip load
> > step.
> 
> Hi, Vivek
> 
> It's just a thought that kernel already have all the information for kexecing so
> we can save user space works. Rethinking about it it benefits more to kexec than
> kdump. For kexec user he can reboot with kexec without any user space actions.
> For kdump there's no much advantage though.

We should rather have a kexec service which starts and loads the kernel
at startup and reboot will simply use kexec boot to boot into that kernel.
We don't need to do anything at kernel level.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ