[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1401081046300.1659-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 10:48:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
<sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jianqian <jianqiang.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] usb/xhci: avoid kernel panic on xhci_suspend()
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:44:26PM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > From: jianqian <jianqiang.tang@...el.com>
> >
> > There is a possible kernel panic faced on xhci_suspend().
> > Due to kernel modified the hub autosupend_delay to 0s, after usb1 root
> > hub finishes initialization, it will trigger runtime_suspend and then
> > it will trigger xhci runtime suspend. But at that time, if
> > xhci->shared_hcd is still doing initialization, it is possible to face
> > null pointer kernel panic in xhci_suspend() function.
> >
> > This patch checks if xhci->shared_hcd is null to avoid panic.
>
> That sounds like this is a race that should be fixed properly, not just
> papered over, right?
That was my reaction too. The best way to solve the problem is to
prevent the USB-2 root hub from suspending until after the USB-3 root
hub has been registered.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists