[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CD8A9A.3010608@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:27:54 +0200
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE
Hi,
On 01/08/2014 06:23 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Update X86 code to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES while
> calling memblock APIs, because memblock API is changed to use NUMA_NO_NODE and
> will produce warning during boot otherwise.
>
> See:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/9/898
>
[...]
or, there are other 3 patches from Sergey Senozhatsky, which actually fix the same warnings:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/6/277 - [PATCH -next] x86 memtest: use NUMA_NO_NODE in do_one_pass()
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/6/280 - [PATCH -next] e820: use NUMA_NO_NODE in memblock_find_dma_reserve()
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1623429 - [PATCH -next] check: use NUMA_NO_NODE in setup_bios_corruption_check()
Regards,
- grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists