[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140108202305.GA8417@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 12:23:05 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@...glemail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: sysfs warnings since kernel 3.13-rc1: "WARNING: ... at
fs/sysfs/group.c:214 sysfs_remove_group"
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 09:01:38PM +0100, Frank Schäfer wrote:
> Am 07.01.2014 18:59, schrieb Tejun Heo:
> > Hello,
> >
> > cc'ing Mauro and quoting whole body for him.
> >
> > So, ummm, the sysfs rule was that any group below a device should be
> > removed before the device itself is removed; however, nothing really
> > checked whether this actually was the case. We didn't care whether
> > the order was reversed and if somebody forgot to remove the group
> > afterwards, we just leaked it. After this commit, sysfs now whines if
> > the order is reversed, so the warning.
> >
> > While this should probably be fixed from the v4l side, I'm really
> > skeptical we're gaining anything by requiring users to explicitly
> > remove groups during device removal. In most cases, this is a
> > completely unnecessary task. Maybe we should just hunt down all
> > remove_group calls and remove all the unnecessary ones.
> >
> > Thanks.
> What about the USB mass storage devices ?
> Is it just a coincidence that this happens with two completely different
> types of USB devices ?
Yes it is, there's a big long thread on the linux-usb and scsi mailing
lists about this, and the fix should be final soon.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists