[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140108225315.GG31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:53:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] perf on raspberry-pi without overflow interrupt
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:28:20PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Should the perf_event interface handle setups like this better and work
> fine in aggregate mode but return ENOTSUP if a sampled or overflow event
> is attempted?
Yeah that would be better, we do something similar for P6 class machines
without lapic IIRC.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists