[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgJe9KR2muA4F9EaXYpDFDLxVZsKOj-8qZFbDZTiRBuww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 23:11:03 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bastian Hecht <hechtb@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sh tree with the tree
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sh tree got conflicts in
> drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c and include/linux/serial_sci.h between
> commits 8fb9631c517b ("serial: sh-sci: Sort headers alphabetically"),
> 20bdcab8268c ("serial: sh-sci: Add OF support") and probably others from
> the arm-soc tree and commits ada80ee7fa60 ("serial: sh-sci: Add OF
> support") and b19ef75c56e9 ("serial: sh-sci: OF definitions need
> linux/of.h") from the sh tree.
>
> The arm-soc tree version is dated much more recently than
> the sh tree version and conflicts badly, so for today I have just dropped
> the sh tree (everything in there was committed before April 2013). Please
> figure this out.
The request to merge the sh code came through Simon with claimed
agreement from SH maintainers to do so -- I didn't verify this since
they have in the past been well-coordinated. Simon?
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists