[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140109085631.GC7572@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:56:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: increase static allocations
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:23:22AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 03:10:55PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On 01/08/2014 02:51 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > >Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> writes:
> > >
> > >>Fuzzing a recent kernel with a large configuration hits the static
> > >>allocation limits and disables lockdep.
> > >
> > >Doesn't that use a lot more memory? I thought lockdep preallocates.
> > >
> > >Doubling may be too aggressive.
> >
> > The patch adds about 4MB of memory usage, I didn't think it's too much for something
> > that is only enabled during debugging.
>
> Wasting 4MB is an issue.
>
> Linus' first Linux system had less total memory than that.
Meh.. if someone from the embedded people care we can add
CONFIG_BASE_SMALL option, until then I couldn't care less about 4m.
> >
> > If this is an issue, can I suggest making these values configurable in the .config
> > and just let users pick whatever they want?
>
> Better allocate it at boot time, using a boot parameter or somesuch.
wrongbot andi is at it again.. no that's far too late.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists