linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] ARM: perf_event: Silence sparse warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140109104519.GA17838@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 10:45:20 +0000
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ARM: perf_event: Silence sparse warning

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:59:38PM +0000, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c:274:25: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different modifiers)
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c:274:25: expected int ( *init_fn )( ... )
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c:274:25: got void const *const data
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> ---

Given that the rest of the series depends on the change to the percpu IRQ
stuff, I think you can just send this patch to Russell's patch system with
my ack:

  Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>

Cheers,

Will

>  arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> index d85055cd24ba..20d553c9f5e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_cpu.c
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int probe_current_pmu(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
>  static int cpu_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> -	int (*init_fn)(struct arm_pmu *);
> +	const int (*init_fn)(struct arm_pmu *);
>  	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>  	struct arm_pmu *pmu;
>  	int ret = -ENODEV;
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> hosted by The Linux Foundation
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/