lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:42:43 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
CC:	<mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<grygorii.strashko@...com>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Pawel.Moll@....com>, <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: davinci: rename platform driver to davinci-wdt

On Thursday 09 January 2014 04:38 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
> 
>> On Friday 29 November 2013 01:44 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>> Wim,
>>>
>>> On Thursday 28 November 2013 06:29 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 11/27/2013 10:04 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday 27 November 2013 09:27 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/27/2013 06:00 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:01 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>>>>>>>> As we switch to use the watchdog core which permits more than one
>>>>>>>> active watchdog in the system, rename platform driver to
>>>>>>>> "davinci-wdt" to be identifiable.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks good to me. Since bulk of this patch touches mach-davinci, I
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> like to take this through my tree to avoid conflicts with other
>>>>>>> mach-davinci patches I accept.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea, and makes sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Added to v3.14/soc with your Reviewed-by
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You should get an Ack from Wim.
>>>
>>> Can you please provide your ack? I will add it to the existing commit.
>>
>> I never received an ack from Wim, but I am going to send this for
>> merging through ARM-SoC anyway. I will keep Wim copied on the pull
>> request so he knows.
> 
> This has my Ack. No issue with getting this through the ARM-SoC tree but bear in mind that there are allready other davinci pateches in the linux-watchdog-next tree+.

Okay. I will add you ack (I just applied my signed tag, grr).
I did a test merge of this patch with today's linux-next and see no
conflicts.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ