[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5603175.k76fij1bcj@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:12:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: print error message and bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU
On Thursday, January 09, 2014 04:15:19 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
> Enhance ACPI CPU hotplug driver to print clear error message and
> bail out early if BIOS returns wrong value in ACPI MADT table or
> _MAT method. Otherwise it will add the CPU device even if failed
> to get APIC ID and fails any operations against sysfs interface:
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpux/online
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Do you have any pointers to bug reports regarding this etc.? If so,
it would be good to add links to them to the commit log.
Thanks!
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index 3c1d6b0..6ce71b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> union acpi_object object = { 0 };
> struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object };
> struct acpi_processor *pr = acpi_driver_data(device);
> - int cpu_index, device_declaration = 0;
> + int apic_id, cpu_index, device_declaration = 0;
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> static int cpu0_initialized;
> unsigned long long value;
> @@ -258,18 +258,21 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> device_declaration = 1;
> pr->acpi_id = value;
> }
> - pr->apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(pr->handle, device_declaration,
> - pr->acpi_id);
> - cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr->apic_id, pr->acpi_id);
>
> - /* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
> - if (!cpu0_initialized && (cpu_index == -1) &&
> - (num_online_cpus() == 1)) {
> - cpu_index = 0;
> + apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(pr->handle, device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
> + if (apic_id < 0) {
> + acpi_handle_err(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
> + pr->apic_id = apic_id;
>
> - cpu0_initialized = 1;
> -
> + cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr->apic_id, pr->acpi_id);
> + if (!cpu0_initialized) {
> + cpu0_initialized = 1;
> + /* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
> + if ((cpu_index == -1) && (num_online_cpus() == 1))
> + cpu_index = 0;
> + }
> pr->id = cpu_index;
>
> /*
> @@ -282,6 +285,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> +
> /*
> * On some boxes several processors use the same processor bus id.
> * But they are located in different scope. For example:
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists