[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140109133533.GO31886@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:35:33 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/18] regulator: vexpress: Use regmap instead of custom
interface
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:25:31PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 12:24 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If this change is making the operations hardware agnostic regmap based
> > ones then they should be being either replaced with standard operations
> > or standard operations being added. It looks like you should be able to
> > use the existing linear map operations.
> Bad wording on my side. What I meant was: it doesn't matter what wacky
> VE-specific interface is hidden behind the regmap, not it's a generic
> regulator driver.
OK.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists