linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 22/85] drivers: gpu: Mark functions as static in radeon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADnq5_O7S0LPNQ4Z9+m2CeQNcTD-2bAoTd4ru66r=bQF5C+2sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 09:35:15 -0500
From:	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maling list - DRI developers 
	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/85] drivers: gpu: Mark functions as static in radeon_device.c

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:40:28AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Rashika Kheria
>> <rashika.kheria@...il.com> wrote:
>> > Mark functions radeon_doorbell_init() and radeon_doorbell_fini() as
>> > static in drm/radeon/radeon_device.c because they are not used outside
>> > this file.
>> >
>> > This eliminates the following warning in drm/radeon/radeon_device.c:
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c:252:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘radeon_doorbell_init’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c:281:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘radeon_doorbell_fini’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
>>
>> I've pulled in a subset of these patches:
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-next-3.14-wip
>> I held off on some of the others as I'd rather fix up the headers
>> properly rather than just cramming everything in radeon.h or
>> radeon-asic.h for now.
>
> Can you elaborate on which patches are putting functions in the wrong
> header, and what header you'd prefer to see them in?

Sure.  atombios.h defines the vbios interface so it shouldn't have any
driver functions defined in it.  radeon_asic.h was only supposed to
include the function definitions for the asic specific callbacks
assigned in radeon_asic.c.  For everything else, I'd rather move to
asic specific headers, e.g., rather than adding r600_*() functions to
radeon.h for example, I'd rather add an r600.h and include that where
r600_*() functions are used, etc.

Thanks,

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/