lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140109143604.GA12858@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:36:04 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Check conflicting CS based on spi->chip_select
 instead of device name

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:27:29PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:06:46PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This actually also points out another issue - if we have two instances
> > of a device on different buses they could end up with the same
> > dev_name() if they have the same chip select.  Hrm.

> I don't think that can happen, at least in case of ACPI, since each ACPI
> device has unique name, such as 'INT33C0:00' - the ':00' suffix is the
> "instance" number ACPI core gives for devices.

That's OK then.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ