[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52CEC518.60606@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:49:44 +0100
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC: <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jonathan.davies@...rix.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <aliguori@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant map definitions
On 09/01/14 16:30, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:10:10AM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> This patch contains the new definitions necessary for grant mapping.
>>
>> v2:
>> - move unmapping to separate thread. The NAPI instance has to be scheduled
>> even from thread context, which can cause huge delays
>> - that causes unfortunately bigger struct xenvif
>> - store grant handle after checking validity
>>
>> v3:
>> - fix comment in xenvif_tx_dealloc_action()
>> - call unmap hypercall directly instead of gnttab_unmap_refs(), which does
>> unnecessary m2p_override. Also remove pages_to_[un]map members
>
> Is it worthy to have another function call
> gnttab_unmap_refs_no_m2p_override in Xen core driver, or just add a
> parameter to control wether we need to touch m2p_override? I *think* it
> will benefit block driver as well?
Anthony Liguori posted a patch to perform something similar in blkback,
but I think the patch never made it upstream:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/12/749
Probably a good time to revisit it so this mechanism can be used by both
blkback and netback?
Roger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists