[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140109205622.GA29458@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:56:22 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Andrew Vagin <avagin@...allels.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vvs@...nvz.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in
nf_conntrack_find_get
Andrew Vagin <avagin@...allels.com> wrote:
> Can we allocate conntrack with zero ct_general.use and increment it at
> the first time before inserting the conntrack into the hash table?
> When conntrack is allocated it is attached exclusively to one skb.
> It must be destroyed with skb, if it has not been confirmed, so we
> don't need refcnt on this stage.
>
> I found only one place, where a reference counter of unconfirmed
> conntract can incremented. It's ctnetlink_dump_table().
What about skb_clone, etc? They will also increment the refcnt
if a conntrack entry is attached to the skb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists