lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 05:56:25 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>,
	Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@...el.com>
Cc:	Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@...el.com>,
	Dasaratharaman Chandramouli 
	<dasaratharaman.chandramouli@...el.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@...el.com>,
	Harshavardhan R Kharche <harshavardhan.r.kharche@...el.com>,
	Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Intel MIC host driver: possible signed underflow (undefined
 behavior) in userspace API

Hi,

Looking at this commit:

commit f69bcbf3b4c4b333dcd7a48eaf868bf0c88edab5
Author: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@...el.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 5 16:42:18 2013 -0700

    Intel MIC Host Driver Changes for Virtio Devices.

Especially at:

+struct mic_copy_desc {
+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+       struct iovec __user *iov;
+#else
+       struct iovec *iov;
+#endif
+       int iovcnt;
+       __u8 vr_idx;
+       __u8 update_used;
+       __u32 out_len;
+};

Seeing iovcnt being declared as a signed integer seems strange. The
first question would be: why is it signed rather than unsigned ?

Then, looking further into 

drivers/misc/mic/host/mic_virtio.c:_mic_virtio_copy()

We can see that the while() loop iterates until the local variable
iovcnt reaches the value 0 (and iovcnt is also a signed integer). If
user-space passes e.g. INT_MIN as iovcnt field, this loop then appears
to depend on an undefined behavior (signed underflow) to complete.
Wouldn't it be better to use an unsigned integers both in the
userspace API and for the local variable ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ