linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: davinci: aemif: get rid of davinci-nand driver dependency on aemif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52CF9DF4.8000607@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:45:00 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
CC:	"ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	<pawel.moll@....com>, <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
	<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: davinci: aemif: get rid of davinci-nand driver
 dependency on aemif

On Thursday 09 January 2014 10:03 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:09:00PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 December 2013 05:36 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> On 12/18/2013 02:13 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 05:21 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
>>>>> Hi, Sekhar
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is based on "Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch"
>>>>> series.
>>>>> The series has passed review at https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/17/241
>>>>> and can be found at http://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch can be still applied on top of the series without conflicts.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please pick up the $subject patch if you are OK with it?
>>>>
>>>> I have no problems with the patch and can pick it too, but need ack from
>>>> MTD maintainer (David) as it touches drivers/mtd/ too.
>>>>
>>>> David,
>>>>
>>>> If you do not have the patch, we can resend it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sekhar
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> Do you agree if this patch will go through Davinci tree?
>>>
>>> This is the last one we need to reuse Davinci Nand driver for Keystone.
>>
>> Since we never got an ack from MTD folks, I am going and go ahead and
>> try pushing this through ARM-SoC regardless. I will CC the MTD
>> maintainers on the pull request so any objections could even be posted
>> there.
> 
> Sorry, I've been a little busy / out for vacation. The MTD parts look OK
> to me. Feel free to take it in your tree.
> 
> Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>

Actually the NAND portion conflicts with some of the changes from Ivan
you took recently. I think it will be better if you take this patch too
with my ack. For me to take it through ARM-SoC, I need an immutable
branch from you - with commits same as what you will eventually be
sending to Linus, based on which I can send a pull request.

In any case, there is a v4 needed to fix a build and checkpatch error I
just noticed. I will send it out soon.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/