[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140110093458.GH31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 10:34:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: comment on usage of perf_invalid_context
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 03:51:30PM -0800, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> Context numbers less than 0 are treated specially within the events
> code, add a comment to document this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 53f97eb..f574820 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1033,6 +1033,10 @@ struct sched_rt_entity {
> struct rcu_node;
>
> enum perf_event_task_context {
> + /*
> + * When <0, allocate a pmu local pmu->pmu_cpu_context (instead
> + * of sharing among pmus in the same context) and forbid task tracking.
> + */
Please explain things in terms of the existing enum names; we don't want
people to start using randon negative values instead of
'perf_invalid_context'.
> perf_invalid_context = -1,
> perf_hw_context = 0,
> perf_sw_context,
> --
> 1.8.5.2
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists