[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140110094015.GU30234@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:40:15 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: hv: Implement the file copy service
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:05:05PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > We've had this discussion before where you urge me to trust the host...
>
> I am just implementing the protocol specification given by the host. If I cannot trust the
> specified protocol, I am not sure what else can be done here.
I'm sorry I got too upset and we're not communicating correctly.
Anyway, looking at the code, there is actually locking in
process_chn_event() which protect ->fcopy_context. It's still sucky to
only store the last message in the queue but that's ok.
+static int fcopy_handle_handshake(int op)
+{
+ int ret = 1;
+
+ pr_info("FCP: user-mode registering done.\n");
+ fcopy_transaction.active = false;
+ set_channel_read_state((struct vmbus_channel *)
+ fcopy_transaction.fcopy_context,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dereferenced inside the call to set_channel_read_state()
+ true);
+
+ if (fcopy_transaction.fcopy_context)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Checked for NULL.
+ hv_fcopy_onchannelcallback(fcopy_transaction.fcopy_context);
+
+ in_hand_shake = false;
+ return ret;
+}
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists