linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] improve robustness on handling migratetype

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140110094834.GV27046@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:48:34 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@...ndmicro.com.cn>,
	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] improve robustness on handling migratetype

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:48:55PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:27:20AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:04:40PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > I found some weaknesses on handling migratetype during code review and
> > > testing CMA.
> > > 
> > > First, we don't have any synchronization method on get/set pageblock
> > > migratetype. When we change migratetype, we hold the zone lock. So
> > > writer-writer race doesn't exist. But while someone changes migratetype,
> > > others can get migratetype. This may introduce totally unintended value
> > > as migratetype. Although I haven't heard of any problem report about
> > > that, it is better to protect properly.
> > > 
> > 
> > This is deliberate. The migratetypes for the majority of users are advisory
> > and aimed for fragmentation avoidance. It was important that the cost of
> > that be kept as low as possible and the general case is that migration types
> > change very rarely. In many cases, the zone lock is held. In other cases,
> > such as splitting free pages, the cost is simply not justified.
> > 
> > I doubt there is any amount of data you could add in support that would
> > justify hammering the free fast paths (which call get_pageblock_type).
> 
> Hello, Mel.
> 
> There is a possibility that we can get unintended value such as 6 as migratetype
> if reader-writer (get/set pageblock_migratetype) race happends. It can be
> possible, because we read the value without any synchronization method. And
> this migratetype, 6, has no place in buddy freelist, so array index overrun can
> be possible and the system can break, although I haven't heard that it occurs.
> 
> I think that my solution is too expensive. However, I think that we need
> solution. aren't we? Do you have any better idea?
> 

It's not something I have ever heard or seen of occurring but
if you've identified that it's a real possibility then split
get_pageblock_migratetype into locked and unlocked versions. Ensure
that calls to set_pageblock_migratetype is always under zone->lock and
get_pageblock_migratetype is also under zone->lock which both should be
true in the majority of cases. Use the unlocked version otherwise but
instead of synchronoing, check if it's returning >= MIGRATE_TYPES and
return MIGRATE_MOVABLE in the unlikely event of a race. This will avoid
harming the fast paths for the majority of users and limit the damage if
a MIGRATE_CMA region is accidentally treated as MIGRATe_MOVABLE

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/