linux-kernel - [PATCH 08/14] kernfs: make kernfs_get_active() block if the node is deactivated but not removed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1389361620-5086-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:46:54 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	JBottomley@...allels.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/14] kernfs: make kernfs_get_active() block if the node is deactivated but not removed

Currently, kernfs_get_active() fails if the target node is
deactivated.  This is fine as a node always gets removed after
deactivation; however, we're gonna add reactivation so the assumption
won't hold.  It'd be incorrect for kernfs_get_active() to fail for a
node which was deactivated only temporarily.

This patch makes kernfs_get_active() block if the node is deactivated
but not removed.  If the node gets reactivated (not yet implemented),
it will be retried and succeed.  If the node gets removed, it will be
woken up and fail.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
 fs/kernfs/dir.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index 52ffac7..f18fc5e 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -149,12 +149,25 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_get_active(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	if (unlikely(!kn))
 		return NULL;
 
-	if (!atomic_inc_unless_negative(&kn->active))
-		return NULL;
-
 	if (kernfs_lockdep(kn))
 		rwsem_acquire_read(&kn->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
-	return kn;
+
+	/*
+	 * Try to obtain an active ref.  If @kn is deactivated, we block
+	 * till either it's reactivated or killed.
+	 */
+	do {
+		if (atomic_inc_unless_negative(&kn->active))
+			return kn;
+
+		wait_event(kernfs_root(kn)->deactivate_waitq,
+			   atomic_read(&kn->active) >= 0 ||
+			   RB_EMPTY_NODE(&kn->rb));
+	} while (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&kn->rb));
+
+	if (kernfs_lockdep(kn))
+		rwsem_release(&kn->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -786,6 +799,7 @@ static void __kernfs_deactivate(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 
 static void __kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 {
+	struct kernfs_root *root = kernfs_root(kn);
 	struct kernfs_node *pos;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&kernfs_mutex);
@@ -830,6 +844,9 @@ static void __kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 
 		kernfs_put(pos);
 	} while (pos != kn);
+
+	/* some nodes killed, kick get_active waiters */
+	wake_up_all(&root->deactivate_waitq);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.8.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/