[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1389361620-5086-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:46:52 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
JBottomley@...allels.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/14] kernfs: invoke kernfs_unmap_bin_file() directly from __kernfs_remove()
kernfs_unmap_bin_file() is supposed to unmap all memory mappings of
the target file before kernfs_remove() finishes; however, it currently
is being called from kernfs_addrm_finish() and has the same race
problem as the original implementation of deactivation when there are
multiple removers - only the remover which snatches the node to its
addrm_cxt->removed list is guaranteed to wait for its completion
before returning.
It can be fixed by moving kernfs_unmap_bin_file() invocation from
kernfs_addrm_finish() to __kernfs_remove(). The function may be
called multiple times but that shouldn't do any harm.
We end up dropping kernfs_mutex in the removal loop and the node may
be removed inbetween by someone else. kernfs_unlink_sibling() is
updated to test whether the node has already been removed and return
accordingly. __kernfs_remove() in turn performs post-unlinking
cleanup only if it actually unlinked the node.
v2: Updated to fit the v2 restructuring of removal path.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
---
fs/kernfs/dir.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index e565ec0..bb4662f 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -121,13 +121,17 @@ static int kernfs_link_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
* Locking:
* mutex_lock(kernfs_mutex)
*/
-static void kernfs_unlink_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
+static bool kernfs_unlink_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
{
+ if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&kn->rb))
+ return false;
+
if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
kn->parent->dir.subdirs--;
rb_erase(&kn->rb, &kn->parent->dir.children);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&kn->rb);
+ return true;
}
/**
@@ -496,7 +500,6 @@ void kernfs_addrm_finish(struct kernfs_addrm_cxt *acxt)
acxt->removed = kn->u.removed_list;
- kernfs_unmap_bin_file(kn);
kernfs_put(kn);
}
}
@@ -854,23 +857,37 @@ static void __kernfs_remove(struct kernfs_addrm_cxt *acxt,
/* unlink the subtree node-by-node */
do {
- struct kernfs_iattrs *ps_iattr;
-
pos = kernfs_leftmost_descendant(kn);
- if (pos->parent) {
- kernfs_unlink_sibling(pos);
+ /*
+ * We're gonna release kernfs_mutex to unmap bin files,
+ * Make sure @pos doesn't go away inbetween.
+ */
+ kernfs_get(pos);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex);
+ kernfs_unmap_bin_file(pos);
+ mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex);
+
+ /*
+ * kernfs_unlink_sibling() succeeds once per node. Use it
+ * to decide who's responsible for cleanups.
+ */
+ if (!pos->parent || kernfs_unlink_sibling(pos)) {
+ struct kernfs_iattrs *ps_iattr =
+ pos->parent ? pos->parent->iattr : NULL;
/* update timestamps on the parent */
- ps_iattr = pos->parent->iattr;
if (ps_iattr) {
ps_iattr->ia_iattr.ia_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
ps_iattr->ia_iattr.ia_mtime = CURRENT_TIME;
}
+
+ pos->u.removed_list = acxt->removed;
+ acxt->removed = pos;
}
- pos->u.removed_list = acxt->removed;
- acxt->removed = pos;
+ kernfs_put(pos);
} while (pos != kn);
}
--
1.8.4.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists