linux-kernel - Re: [patch/rfc] perf on raspberry-pi without overflow interrupt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:54:38 -0500 (EST)
From:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To:	eranian@...il.com
cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	Chad Paradis <chad.paradis@...t.maine.edu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] perf on raspberry-pi without overflow interrupt

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Stephane Eranian wrote:

> But before we do that, can someone confirm that on Pi there is simply
> no interrupt
> generated by the PMU or is it that we don't know how to route it back?

The closest I've seen is this posting from one of the rasp-pi employees 
who presumably has access to better documentation than we do:

   http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=19151

It sounds like the SoC just doesn't bother hooking the nPMUIRQ line up 
anything useful on the interrupt controller.  The Pi is complicated 
because it's really just a GPU chip that just happens to have an ARM1176 
core hanging off the side of it.

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/