linux-kernel - [PATCH-next] xen: delete new instances of _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389365408-24034-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:50:08 -0500
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH-next] xen: delete new instances of __cpuinit usage

Commit 1fe565517b57676884349dccfd6ce853ec338636 ("xen/events: use
the FIFO-based ABI if available") added new instances of __cpuinit
macro usage.

We removed this a couple versions ago; we now want to remove
the compat no-op stubs.  Introducing new users is not what
we want to see at this point in time, as it will break once
the stubs are gone.

Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
---

[Patch based on today's linux-next tree, so if xen/tip.git#linux-next
 gets rebased, then the above commit ID will be invalidated; if it
 _does_ get rebased, then feel free to squash this fix into the orig.]

diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
index 5b2c039f16c5..1de2a191b395 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static const struct evtchn_ops evtchn_ops_fifo = {
 	.resume            = evtchn_fifo_resume,
 };
 
-static int __cpuinit evtchn_fifo_init_control_block(unsigned cpu)
+static int evtchn_fifo_init_control_block(unsigned cpu)
 {
 	struct page *control_block = NULL;
 	struct evtchn_init_control init_control;
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int __cpuinit evtchn_fifo_init_control_block(unsigned cpu)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int __cpuinit evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification(struct notifier_block *self,
+static int evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification(struct notifier_block *self,
 						  unsigned long action,
 						  void *hcpu)
 {
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int __cpuinit evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification(struct notifier_block *self,
 	return ret < 0 ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
-static struct notifier_block evtchn_fifo_cpu_notifier __cpuinitdata = {
+static struct notifier_block evtchn_fifo_cpu_notifier = {
 	.notifier_call	= evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification,
 };
 
-- 
1.8.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/