lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <063D6719AE5E284EB5DD2968C1650D6D457C16@AcuExch.aculab.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:58:03 +0000
From:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	'walt' <w41ter@...il.com>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3.12 033/118] usb: xhci: Link TRB must not occur within
 a USB payload burst

From: walt
> > In the meantime, try this patch, which is something of a long shot.
> 
> No difference.  But I notice the code enables the TRB quirk only if the
> xhci_version is specifically 0x95.  My debug messages claim that "xHCI
> doesn't need link TRB QUIRK" so I'm wondering if adding my asmedia device
> to the quirks list really doesn't change anything unless it's xhci 0.95.

I think the intention was that the quirk would be applied for your
hardware even though it claims to be version 0.96.
That was gust a hopeful guess that the same change would help.

> Does lspci provide that information?  I'm not seeing anything obvious.
I've only seen it in the diagnostic prints (that aren't normally output).

	David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ