linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: kprobes-test: use <asm/opcodes.h> for ARM instruction building

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAArO44uuHoTjb9TJAXJLmp88GeY+kEGp+nom8LMt8-KoF0isYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:49:44 +0200
From:	Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org>
To:	Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>,
	Linaro Kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: kprobes-test: use <asm/opcodes.h> for ARM
 instruction building

On 23 December 2013 18:19, Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org> wrote:
> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
>
> The kprobes test will build certain instructions incorrectly if building
> big endian as .word output gets endian-swapped by the linker. Change to
> using <asm/opcodes.h> and __inst_arm() to produce instructions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> [taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org: fixed a few missed instructions]
> Signed-off-by: Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondratiuk@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c |  595 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 298 insertions(+), 297 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c
> index 8393129..56be041 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/kprobes-test-arm.c

[snip]

> @@ -1180,43 +1181,43 @@ void kprobe_arm_test_cases(void)
>                                                                                 \
>         TEST_COPROCESSOR( "stc"two"     0, cr0, [r15, #4]")                     \
>         TEST_COPROCESSOR( "stc"two"     0, cr0, [r15, #-4]")                    \
> -       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(".word 0x"cc"daf0001   @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15, #4]!")    \
> -       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(".word 0x"cc"d2f0001   @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15, #-4]!")   \
> -       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(".word 0x"cc"caf0001   @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15], #4")     \
> -       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(".word 0x"cc"c2f0001   @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15], #-4")    \
> +       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(__inst_arm(0x##ccdaf0001) "    @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15, #4]!")    \
> +       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(__inst_arm(0x##ccd2f0001) "    @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15, #-4]!")   \
> +       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(__inst_arm(0x##cccaf0001) "    @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15], #4")     \
> +       TEST_UNSUPPORTED(__inst_arm(0x##ccc2f0001) "    @ stc"two"      0, cr0, [r15], #-4")    \

Oops. Should be something like __inst_arm(0x##cc##c2f0001).
My compiler truncated it to 32 bits, so these tests passed anyway.
I'll repost a fixed series.

-- 
Regards,
Taras Kondratiuk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/