linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] arm: remove !CPU_V6 and !GENERIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D02470.6050303@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:48:48 +0800
From:	Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer@...il.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"gang.chen@...anux.com" <gang.chen@...anux.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jaccon.bastiaansen@...il.com" <jaccon.bastiaansen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm: remove !CPU_V6 and !GENERIC_ATOMIC64 build dependencies
 for XEN

On 01/10/2014 02:42 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:47:24PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 09 January 2014, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:00:23PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>>>> Remove !GENERIC_ATOMIC64 build dependency:
>>>>> - rename atomic64_xchg to armv7_atomic64_xchg and define it even ifdef
>>>>>   GENERIC_ATOMIC64;
>>>>> - call armv7_atomic64_xchg directly from xen/events.h.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove !CPU_V6 build dependency:
>>>>> - introduce __cmpxchg8 and __cmpxchg16, compiled even ifdef
>>>>>   CONFIG_CPU_V6;
>>>>> - implement sync_cmpxchg using __cmpxchg8 and __cmpxchg16.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
>>>>> CC: arnd@...db.de
>>>>> CC: linux@....linux.org.uk
>>>>> CC: will.deacon@....com
>>>>> CC: gang.chen@...anux.com
>>>>> CC: catalin.marinas@....com
>>>>> CC: jaccon.bastiaansen@...il.com
>>>>> CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>>>> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm confused here. It looks like you want to call armv7 code in a v6 kernel.
>>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>> This is about being able to build a kernel that runs on ARMv6 and ARMv7
>>> and also includes Xen. Because of obvious hardware limitations, Xen
>>> will only run on v7, but currently you cannot even build it once you
>>> enable (pre-v6K) ARMv6 support, since the combined v6+v7 kernel can't
>>> do atomic accesses in a generic way on non-32bit variables.
>>
>> Yep, that's right.
> 
> Ok, thanks for the explanation. Looking at the patch, I wonder whether it's
> not cleaner just to implement xchg code separately for Xen? The Linux code
> isn't always sufficient (due to the GENERIC_ATOMIC64 stuff) and most of the
> churn coming out of this patch is an attempt to provide some small code
> reuse at the cost of code readability.
> 
> What do others think?
> 

What Will said sounds reasonable to me.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/