[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140110171613.GA23647@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:16:13 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: sohny thomas <sohny.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kumuda <kumuda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ipv6: default route for link local address is not added while assigning a address
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 05:33:08PM +0100, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> CC: netdev
>
> Le 10/01/2014 13:20, sohny thomas a écrit :
> >Default route for link local address is configured automatically if
> >NETWORKING_IPV6=yes is in ifcfg-eth*.
> >When the route table for the interface is flushed and a new address is
> >added to
> >the same device with out removing linklocal addr, default route for link
> >local
> >address has to added by default.
> I would say that removing the link local route but not the link local
> address
> is a configuration problem.
> If you remove a connected route but not the associated address, you will
> have
> the same problem.
We have some user accessible routes that are essential for IPv6 stack
to work at all. So I don't know if I can agree with that.
Maybe flush is a bit too aggressive?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists