| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 13:36:59 +1100 (EST) From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Fix possible NULL pointer dereference in inode_permission() On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > There's an extra source of headache, BTW - what about the "LSM stacking" > > crowd and their plans? > > LSM stacking is a pipedream right now anyway, isn't it? It's been > talked about for years and years, I've never seen a patch-set that is > even remotely something we'd seriously consider. > And there's no good justification for it. -- James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists