linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] virtio_blk: Add rw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1389321591-25455-5-git-send-email-matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>
Date:	Thu,  9 Jan 2014 21:39:50 -0500
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
To:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] virtio_blk: Add rw_page implementation

This is an implementation of the new rw_page interface.  It primarily
demonstrates a low-impact, low-reward method for adding support to a
driver.  I don't expect it to improve performance; in fact I expect it
to worsen performance slightly since there are still memory allocations
in the I/O path.

Please don't apply this patch.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 6a680d4..4c1c9ad 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -110,11 +110,22 @@ static int __virtblk_add_req(struct virtqueue *vq,
 	return virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, num_out, num_in, vbr, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }
 
+#define rw_to_dmad(rw)	(((rw) == WRITE) ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE)
+
 static inline void virtblk_request_done(struct virtblk_req *vbr)
 {
 	struct request *req = vbr->req;
 	int error = virtblk_result(vbr);
 
+	if ((unsigned long)req & 1) {
+		struct virtio_blk *vblk = (void *)((unsigned long)req & ~1UL);
+		int rw = (vbr->out_hdr.type & VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT) ? WRITE : READ;
+		struct page *page = sg_page(vbr->sg);
+		dma_unmap_sg(&vblk->vdev->dev, vbr->sg, 1, rw_to_dmad(rw));
+		page_endio(page, rw, error);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if (req->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC) {
 		req->resid_len = vbr->in_hdr.residual;
 		req->sense_len = vbr->in_hdr.sense_len;
@@ -239,6 +250,38 @@ static int virtblk_get_id(struct gendisk *disk, char *id_str)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int virtblk_rw_page(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
+				struct page *page, int rw)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct virtio_blk *vblk = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
+	struct virtblk_req *vbr;
+	int err;
+
+	vbr = kmalloc(sizeof(*vbr) + sizeof(struct scatterlist), GFP_NOFS);
+	if (!vbr)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	vbr->req = (void *)((unsigned long)vblk | 1);
+	vbr->out_hdr.type = (rw == WRITE) ? VIRTIO_BLK_T_OUT : VIRTIO_BLK_T_IN;
+	vbr->out_hdr.sector = sector;
+	vbr->out_hdr.ioprio = 0;
+
+	sg_init_table(vbr->sg, 1);
+	sg_set_page(vbr->sg, page, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, 0);
+	sg_mark_end(vbr->sg);
+	if (dma_map_sg(&vblk->vdev->dev, vbr->sg, 1, rw_to_dmad(rw))) {
+		kfree(vbr);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&vblk->vq_lock, flags);
+	err = __virtblk_add_req(vblk->vq, vbr, vbr->sg, 1);
+	virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vblk->vq_lock, flags);
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int virtblk_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
 			     unsigned int cmd, unsigned long data)
 {
@@ -278,6 +321,7 @@ static int virtblk_getgeo(struct block_device *bd, struct hd_geometry *geo)
 }
 
 static const struct block_device_operations virtblk_fops = {
+	.rw_page = virtblk_rw_page,
 	.ioctl  = virtblk_ioctl,
 	.owner  = THIS_MODULE,
 	.getgeo = virtblk_getgeo,
-- 
1.8.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/