[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D07DA5.7080508@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:09:25 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Metin Doslu <metin@...usdata.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@...usdata.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <klamm@...dex-team.ru>,
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 9/9] mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check
On 01/10/2014 01:10 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim
> emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow
> entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes
> themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that
> are still in use after they have a significant amount of their cache
> reclaimed, without any of those pages actually refaulting. The shadow
> entries will just sit there and waste memory. In the worst case, the
> shadow entries will accumulate until the machine runs out of memory.
>
> To get this under control, the VM will track radix tree nodes
> exclusively containing shadow entries on a per-NUMA node list.
> Per-NUMA rather than global because we expect the radix tree nodes
> themselves to be allocated node-locally and we want to reduce
> cross-node references of otherwise independent cache workloads. A
> simple shrinker will then reclaim these nodes on memory pressure.
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists