[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140111170151.GO15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:01:51 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: check more I/O errors
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 11:57:45AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
This lacks a description detailing why this change is necessary. While
I can see the sense in preventing a subsequent write succeeding after a
failed page register write, we still continue blindly on accessing the
device after a read or write fails. For istance, how many calls to
reg_write() or reg_read() are checked for failure?
That said, the patch does not appear to create any detrimental effects,
so it gets a tested-by but *no* acked-by. Please give it a better
description justifying this change for an acked-by.
Tested-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists